Currently the mandate of the House administration is limited to the House infrastructure, which is consistent with all the policies that are in place. For example, there is an acceptable use policy. There is some monitoring in place so that if there are suspicious activities, the House administration will be notified.
In extending services to personal devices, questions will need to be asked and answered, and then there might be implications. Does the acceptable use policy apply? To what extent? What do we do, because if the House of Commons is to take responsibility, then there's also responsibility with regard to content, and it's not only limited to parliamentary functions. Members of Parliament are individuals, human beings, they have hobbies on the weekend; they browse the web. It's not clear that they will want this mandate to be given to the House administration at this stage.
Also, if there are suspicious activities on the web, a data breach, then the mandate you give to the administration also gives us responsibility, and essentially you will forfeit some kind of freedom or liberty with these devices. If there were to be a recommendation, a willingness that the House administration explore this, of course, it could be explored. The members and each member individual will need to be aware of all the implications.