Mr. Cooper is speaking to a number of other instances that he's speculating about that have nothing to do with his notice of motion. The motion that he's moved says, “That, in relation to its Order of Reference of Thursday, May 9, 2024, regarding the prima facie contempt concerning the People's Republic of China's cyber attack against members of Parliament”.... It refers specifically to a cyber-attack. Mr. Cooper now is not speaking about a cyber-attack. He's speaking of other instances of potential foreign interference that he is citing. It has nothing to do with the cyber-attack. How is this relevant at all?
It seems clear that Mr. Cooper's intention here is to waste the committee's valuable time when witnesses were asked to come to this committee to answer questions on another matter. He is now just wasting the committee's time with irrelevant arguments.