Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I remember when you occupied Mr. Holland's position in the House of Commons, Madam Chair.
Mr. Holland, I have several questions for you and I would like you to answer them fairly quickly. This is an important question.
Last week, I had the opportunity to ask three experts about the health of interpreters: should Parliament continue to maintain hybrid sessions at this time, given that we know that every hybrid session causes problems or injuries to interpreters?
The first expert replied as follows:
In my line of work, if it's a matter of convenience versus harm, I always pick no harm with a little bit of extra inconvenience.
The second expert said he agreed with his colleague and that there was a duty of care.
The third replied that the answer was clear enough from an ethical perspective.
Who makes the decision to let interpreters continue to do this work, when we know very well that interpreting hybrid sessions is harmful to their health?