Yes. I mean, I think you've missed the point a bit here, although I'm not sure I agree with the necessity of actually expressing the $30 as a minimum. What I said in my opening remarks, which weren't supposed to be divulged until later, but in any event.... The reporting requirement is $200. Those issues get looked at once they're reported. The $30 is something the office has followed for many years in the sense that it was kind of a rule of thumb that if something was under $30, it was probably not going to create a conflict of interest.
I think the desire on the part of Mr. Dion to put in the $30 was partly to distinguish it from the rule of the $200, which is a disclosure rule, so you can't confuse those rules. However, the fact of the matter is that in the decisions we made over the years, we said, for example, that if you went for an all-day meeting with somebody and they gave you a gift of a lunch—in other words, they served you lunch in the middle of it—that wasn't going to be a problem because it was normal etiquette and stuff.
The reason we were looking at $30 in my time—and undoubtedly that practice has continued, but I don't know—was just as a guideline to people that of course if there's a legitimate reason for offering something to somebody, $30 is a reasonable amount to consider reasonable—if that helps at all.