I'll move to a different topic. Commissioner Hogue took note of the fact that many Canadians don't necessarily understand that public servants are non-partisan. She made a recommendation that we add to the panel membership a distinguished Canadian in whom the public would perhaps have greater confidence. The clerk, I understand, did send a letter to all the political parties in March to try to achieve unanimity with respect to that recommendation.
To be honest with you, it seems to me to be a very reasonable recommendation that could enhance the credibility of the work of the group on the part of Canadians. That unanimity was not achieved, and I don't understand exactly why. Is that something we're going to revisit? It does seem like a very reasonable thing that could actually help.