I'll let you continue, but I have a limited amount of time, and that is entirely the point, presenting in a factual way. What arguably is contained in the backgrounder is reporting that was not factual in the sense that it did not provide a full and complete picture. It completely downplayed what, on the whole, were generally positive narratives about Mr. Carney. That was the conclusion of the National Post. The Toronto Sun headline, upon reviewing the materials, stated “China actively promoting Carney Liberal campaign”. Yet, if you just read the release, you'd have no idea of that. You'd likely draw the opposite conclusion of that.
