May I add a nuance about my colleague's answer and the relationship with social media platforms?
During the election, there were certainly engagements with social media companies to provide context. While it's absolutely true that it's the purview of those social media companies, since they own their platforms, to moderate what goes onto them, we wanted to ensure that there was information about those threats provided to those companies. Our colleagues at the PCO arranged for regular meetings with the platforms, and at one point we did brief them on the types of threats that we see, especially the threats posed by artificial intelligence in the use of social media to propagate misinformation and disinformation and those sorts of things.
The other thing I'll mention is that when it comes to candidates in elections, as I said, we ran a hotline for candidates to raise concerns about cybersecurity. In those particular instances, should a candidate ever say that there's wrong information about them online, we're not going to be able to contact the social media company and we would not be in a position to ask them to take it down, but we can provide the candidate with information and advice on the tools that are available to them and to the party so that they can have this discussion—