I thank the member for the question, Mr. Chair.
Yes, a lot of work is done upstream. As was said earlier, this is ongoing work. We have databases and access to narratives that we monitor on a daily basis with a team of analysts. All this posturing is taken during elections, and even before elections, to set the monitoring parameters, especially with regard to digital platforms, in our case.
In addition, a lot of incidents are detected and not necessarily reported, for a number of reasons. In particular, we don't want to amplify content that wouldn't be present in the Canadian ecosystem. An analysis is also done on that.
To answer your question, I would say that it's not only about being reactive once the threat is known. Work is also being done to ensure that the threat doesn't reach a point where it could influence Canadian public opinion.
It's the same thing, I believe, for the other members of the SITE task force.