That's correct.
A lot of those groups are active online. Although there is some backlash against engaging online, and although we want to hold more town halls—those things are fine—the reality is that people are online, even in far-flung communities in rural environments far from Ottawa. There has to be a meaningful plan to engage these communities online. When you have platforms, for example, that disincentivize boring, authoritative sources in favour of polarizing, inflammatory content, there's an imbalance in the architecture for reaching those citizens. This doesn't mean having more regulation, but it does mean we need to understand why the information is designed so that election management bodies, for example, have a harder time reaching those communities than—