However, it's not necessarily so, because I'm citing an example where a foreign entity was purchasing merchandise, goods or items for the intent of circumventing the act. I know there are certain provisions for when there is evidence that it was wilfully circumvented, but these things are very difficult to establish and very difficult to prosecute. It seems to me—but I'm open to hearing you—that this is another way to get around the intent, which is to stop the flow of foreign money into third parties.
