Thank you.
That part makes sense to me. I completely get the freedom of expression argument.
However, it strikes me that you could have that in place and still ask for separation in the organizing of funds. If you want to make sure that none of that 10% of the owned funds includes money that comes from a foreign entity, you could ask for a separation of funds. That would make sure they don't make it into the 10%. I'm fine with the 10%. I don't think that's a problem.
I think the freedom of expression argument holds fine, but if we want to make sure none of the foreign funds are used for that, we have to ask for a separation of those funds altogether.