Mr. Perrault, your answer to my last question was that where third parties are subject to the exception, and they can use their own funds for their non-contribution revenue, there's nothing in the bill that prevents the source of those funds from being foreign.
What is to stop foreign actors from exploiting this exception by directing money to third parties disguised as the purchase of goods or services, funds that would be treated as non-contribution revenue and therefore could be spent by third parties as part of their own funds for regulated activities to influence our elections?