It will be similar in its essence. By this I mean that the purpose of the regime will be to create transparency in public affairs and to counter malign foreign influence. There will be some differences. For example, in Canada we'll have an independent commissioner. In the U.S., U.K. and Australia, they report to government officials. There are certain differences such as this that adapt to the realities of how the lobbying regimes in these countries are established, but in essence we're talking about similar regimes.
