I don't want to comment on the regime of my Australian colleagues. That would be inappropriate on my part. However, they clearly indicated the lessons they learned from the implementation of their regime, which dates back to 2018 and predates ours by a few years. They were kind of pioneers in this area.
We took those lessons into account to create our own regime and the powers of the compliance measures. What's also important is that we are setting up information-sharing relationships with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and other security agencies.
That way, the information gathered by the commissioner can be shared, under certain conditions, with security agencies. The sharing will go the other way as well. Cases of non-compliance sometimes stem from information provided by intelligence and security agencies, which is a huge benefit.
As you say, cases of non-compliance will definitely be quite hard to find, but we can count on the support of Canada's security and intelligence agencies.