Okay. I understand that geography is a significant hurdle in Canada, but there has to be some way to curtail the abuse from that perspective. I don't know—ask them to name three streets in the riding or to name two restaurants. There has to be something to prevent this absurd situation.
That takes me to my next point, which is about the signatures. There's been some discussion about this today.
You are required to get 100 signatures. I'm not sure that preventing somebody from signing two candidates' forms is necessary. That might be a bit too strict, but there has to be a way to curtail it. I don't think the signatures are required to be submitted in the original form. It can be done electronically, if I'm not mistaken. Could you confirm that?
The second question is this: What processes are used or what steps are taken to validate the signatures? Does anybody do any follow-up, knock on the door and say, “Hi, Mr. Maloney. Your name appears on this form. Was it you who signed it, or was it some member of your family?”, etc.?
