I certainly agree that the quality of the list is critical to the quality of the election, both in terms of making it accessible and to the integrity of the process. That's something that's important.
At the election, we had coverage of 95.2%. That is very slightly lower than in past elections and is very comparable, and we had an accuracy of 92.2%, which again is slightly lower. If you compare that to 2019, which was a fixed-date election, coverage was slightly higher, at just over 96%, because we have the ability in a fixed-date election to do information campaigns ahead of the election and to promote people to register ahead of time and either add themselves or remove themselves if they have moved.
It is not at all surprising that you would see a difference between fixed-date elections and non-fixed-date elections. The numbers that we have here are comparable and are historically on the high end of accuracy and coverage for the national register of electors.