Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses.
I'm going to address my first question to Mr. Deveaux.
You noted that, with the advancement of AI, we're receiving a lot of AI inputs, which are likely going to continue to increase in the way of, for example, written submissions to committees and correspondence from constituents.
At the same time, we members and our staff are increasingly using AI to do our jobs, including when our staff uses AI to do research, to look into constituent inquiries and to get suggestions on how to respond to those inquiries. What we're starting to see is an AI loop—AI talking to AI in terms of AI inputs and AI outputs. For me, what is fundamental is that technology augments human judgment and doesn't supplant human judgment.
At what point is there a real risk that, in fact, technology is supplanting human judgment? How do we guard against that as parliamentarians in the work we do?