First of all, I really like this line of argument about trying to put something in the legislation that protects the integrity of elections, because in a number of ways, the integrity of elections is tested and we have to find ways for the public to be protected, which is really what it's about. It's about protecting the public's ability to choose their representatives in a way that is not taken over by these sorts of campaigns, which have nothing to do with the vote on the ballot in that particular riding.
I think there's a way for language to be crafted so it doesn't go too far. That's the key. If you make it too heavy or if you make the range too wide, there will be too much overlap and too much of a restriction on rights and things like that, and it will be struck down.
As far as who makes the decision is concerned, I can see that landing in court if people are.... I think that's probably where it would end up.