I think the Chief Electoral Officer has spoken to disability advocates and has heard multiple complaints. The number of complaints in this election was higher than it has been before, which was also presented as part of his testimony. Whether or not it's the end goal of your organization, this is the result. People had a more difficult time casting their ballot in this election—both in the Battle River—Crowfoot by-election and in the general election—than ever before. They were predominantly seniors who had to wait in longer lines and found the sometimes metre-long ballot more inaccessible or people with disabilities, including, as you mentioned, people who are vision-impaired.
These actions not only have caused people to be unable to wait in line longer to vote but also meant, in many cases, that people no longer had the ability to vote privately, because they required assistance in the ballot box in order to manage the ballot that your organization forced to be so unwieldy that they could not manage on their own.
Why would you take these actions, and what do you have to say to those Canadians who had their privacy breached because of their inability to manage the ballot on their own because of your campaign's actions?