Okay, all those in favour of the motion as amended?
(Motion as amended agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]
Okay, on staff at in camera meetings:
Each committee member in attendance shall be permitted to have one staff member attend any in camera meetings. In addition, each party shall be permitted to have one staff member from a House officer attend in camera meetings.
It seems innocuous.
Kellie is moving it.
(Motion agreed to)
On transcripts of in camera meetings:
That in camera meetings be transcribed and that the transcription be kept with the clerk of the committee for later consultation by members of the committee or by their staff.
Do we have a mover for that?
It's Brad, again.
(Motion agreed to)
With regard to notice of motion, you might take a little time to read this one. It's a bit convoluted. It was from the government operations committee, and it was passed there. It simply says:
That a notice of 48 hours, interpreted as two nights, be required before a member may move a substantive motion, unless it deals directly with the matter before the committee at this time, provided that (1) this notice be e-mailed to the committee clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. from Monday to Friday; that (2) the notice be distributed by e-mail to members in both official languages by the clerk on the same day the said notice was transmitted if it was received no later than the deadline hour; that (3) notices received after the deadline hour be deemed to have been received during the next business day; and that (4) this rule does not prevent a member to give notice of a motion orally during a meeting of the committee, in which case notice shall be deemed to have been given before the deadline that day.
I guess it's trying to set out that you need roughly two days, meeting to meeting, for a notice of motion but that you can do one orally.
We have Brad moving it, and we have some discussion.
Jean Crowder.