Evidence of meeting #123 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was discussion.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Vice-Chair  Mr. John Barlow (Foothills, CPC)
Kerry Diotte  Edmonton Griesbach, CPC
James Van Raalte  Director General, Accessibility Secretariat, Department of Employment and Social Development
Gordie Hogg  South Surrey—White Rock, Lib.
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Stephanie Feldman

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

That's correct.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Okay.

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

I know it sounds confusing, but if this one is not passed, we will discuss your next one, NDP-2.2. However, if this....

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

But I won't get to amend it.

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

When we discuss it, you will.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Oh, I will get to amend mine if this one doesn't pass. Okay.

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

That's correct.

Mr. Diotte, go ahead.

9:35 p.m.

Edmonton Griesbach, CPC

Kerry Diotte

I would like a recorded vote on this as well.

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Thank you.

Is there further discussion on CPC-9.1?

(Amendment negatived: nays 5; yeas 3)

It is defeated, and therefore we go to NDP 2.2.

Is there any discussion?

Ms. Hardcastle, go ahead.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

May I make an amendment to this one, then?

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Yes.

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

I would like to change the word to “shall”.

9:35 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

That's in proposed subclauses 15(2) and 15(3).

9:35 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Yes. I would like to change the word “must” to the word “shall”, in the hope that it will be more palatable to my colleagues across the way so that it will pass.

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Thank you, Ms. Hardcastle.

The concern with “shall” is that it's ambiguous language. We have been using “may” or “must”.

Mr. Van Raalte, do you have any concerns with the word “shall” in place of “must”? We're giving you a lot of “may”, “must” and “shall” tonight.

9:40 p.m.

Director General, Accessibility Secretariat, Department of Employment and Social Development

James Van Raalte

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

The current drafting protocol is “must” versus “may”.

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Where would “shall” come into that?

9:40 p.m.

Director General, Accessibility Secretariat, Department of Employment and Social Development

James Van Raalte

It's old. It is too ambiguous from an interpretation perspective, which is why the drafting has moved toward “may” versus “must”.

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Thank you.

I think, then, the feeling would be that—

9:40 p.m.

NDP

Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

We've already given this a go with the word “must”. I'll stand with my amendment with the word “shall”, and let's see what happens—with a recorded vote, please.

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

Okay.

Go ahead, Mr. Nuttall.

9:40 p.m.

Conservative

Alex Nuttall Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

I have a point of clarification, because I do want to speak to the main motion. Are we on an amendment to change it to “shall” in the motion—

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

That's correct.

9:40 p.m.

Conservative

Alex Nuttall Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

—or is it that the motion is the amendment to the clause right now?

9:40 p.m.

The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow

We're going to be doing an amendment to the amendment.

Ms. Hardcastle will have to move an amendment to the amendment to change “must” to “shall”.