Thank you for the question. It's a very good one.
With budget 2016, as I mentioned, we got $416 million, and basically the profile for the first year was to issue $208 million. In addition to that at the department, we decided collectively to spend more money on housing because, as you will all agree, the needs are way higher than the allocation that we have collectively.
The projects were proposal-based, so we made three calls for proposals. We had three streams in the calls for proposals. The first one was the obvious one, the immediate needs. What are the immediate needs? The second one was capacity development, which is connected to some of the questions and comments today that it's not only building but that we also need to help first nation members improve their capacity to not only build the houses but maintain them. The other one was the innovation fund.
We did three calls for proposals, and why three? Well, we had to consider the construction season. It's because we were approached by some first nation leaders who said we were going too fast. Some of them weren't necessarily prepared, since it was a good surprise to get the money and the budget. Because of that, we worked with the first nations and basically we said we would have three calls for proposals. When we received the proposals, of course, we worked with our colleagues in the region, and you can imagine that we had a lot of proposals. I referred to the number of projects. As we speak now, 965 projects have been approved, but that translates to basically more than 3,000 units to be either renovated or newly constructed.