Just on that, on the basis of it being a simple bill, as Mr. Siksay puts it, I think that's always open to interpretation. When you look at the Senate reform bill going through the Liberal Senate right now, it's two paragraphs long and it's been over ten months that they've been studying that bill.
I don't think it's necessarily that I'm disagreeing with him that we couldn't look at this and expedite the bill. I think there's goodwill to do that. But on Mr. Karygiannis' point, I think it's incumbent on Mr. Komarnicki or anyone else that if there is a reason that they suggest there be one or two witnesses....
I'm not saying anyone would agree to drag this out. I did raise that during the steering committee. We were going to go through this even without getting officials, and then we said we should have officials. I said there might be one or two other witnesses who might come to mind and that we shouldn't restrict it. I'm not saying to drag it out, but I did agree that we should try to expedite it. Now I think the onus is on anyone on this committee. If they do say there's someone urgent from whom they think we should hear, I don't think I would say no to that.