Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses for coming.
I'm not going to play with numbers. I'm going to call a fair shot a fair shot. Mr. Komarnicki might want to play with numbers and sort of do a run-about and say is this this, or is this this?
The number I'm looking at is what the previous individuals who were here said--that there were 20,000 children--and I believe it was Ms. Jarratt who said so--who came with their mothers. That was about 60 years ago, plus. So when you take that over two generations and think of each child as having two kids, you could be looking at 80,000 Canadians who could be affected. That's simple math that anybody who's a mathematician can put together or any individual can put together. It doesn't take a lawyer to do a reversal, as Mr. Komarnicki did, in order to do this.
However, going on the record here, the minister was in committee on February 19, and when the question was put to her, “Have you advertised?” she turned to her official, and her official said, “Yes, we have advertised”. Since then, the deputy minister has issued a letter to this committee apologizing for having--I don't want to use the word “lied”, because it is improper as far as parliamentary terms are concerned, so I'll use another word--misled the committee.
Now, I'm wondering if they had, in your estimation, done an aggressive campaign of advertising, telling Canadians what they could face, how many people you would guesstimate would be coming out.