I can't speak for Mr. Ellis. I think you've read what he said in the letter.
I think the big disappointment that occurred was the fact that—and I think I said it before—when we established those nine competencies that we were going to use for recruitment purposes, we also asked that every member who was in place be tested against those nine competencies. And I think what he was getting at in his letter--that's my opinion—was that—You re-evaluated all your staff, the present staff you have, against those nine competencies. Some didn't meet them, and I recommended that they not be reappointed. Some were missing just one factor, and we trained them and got them back to up speed.
So I guess what he was saying is that the ones I recommended for reappointment, regardless of the government in placeWhere in my first two years of the mandate I think 95% of my recommendations were accepted, that was not the case then.