Mr. Fleury, every day when somebody wakes up and goes to work, they either look forward to going to work and they're happy about it or they go to work grudgingly because they have to pay a mortgage and they have to feed the family. I don't think in your case, sir, it was the second. I think every morning when you got up to go to work you were happy about what you were doing; you were proud of what you were doing. Certainly we can see in this committee, from your testimony today, that you had a very successful 42 years, and you certainly made a lot of contributions to this country.
From that, if I were to come to the conclusion that during the last nine months, as you said, you didn't have any added value, I would say that probably you were not happy about going to work and you decided you were going to pack it in. Your blood pressure is lower now. I would come to the conclusion that although you were trying to make a difference, and as a 42-year public servant you had a lot of know-how—The list of people praising you, even in this committee and everybody around this table, certainly is impeccable. But I would come to the conclusion, sir, that you were at loggerheads with the minister, and certainly the minister was not listening to you, and one morning you woke up and said, screw it, I'm gone.
I would say that on the other side the minister was probably even happier to get rid of you, because you were pointing in the right direction and giving advice to the minister that the minister needed to take, and that this government is certainly not willing to go in that direction. This is why we are in the quandary that we are in today, and this is why you probably said, enough is enough and I'm leaving.
How close am I, sir?