Evidence of meeting #18 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was worker.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Roslyn Kunin  Director, British Columbia Office, Canada West Foundation
Martin Collacott  Senior Fellow, Fraser Institute
Don DeVoretz  Professor of Economics, Co-Director and Principal Investigator of the Centre of Excellence on Immigration and Integration, Simon Fraser University, Canadian Immigration Policy Council
David Fairey  Researcher, Trade Union Research Bureau, British Columbia and Yukon Territory Building and Construction Trades Council
Wayne Peppard  Executive Director, British Columbia and Yukon Territory Building and Construction Trades Council
Joe Barrett  Researcher, British Columbia and Yukon Territory Building and Construction Trades Council
Lualhati Alcuitas  Grassroots Women
Erika Del Carmen Fuchs  Organizer, Justicia for Migrant Workers--British Columbia
Tung Chan  Chief Executive Officer, S.U.C.C.E.S.S.
Denise Valdecantos  Board Member, Philippine Women Centre of BC
Mildred German  Member, Filipino-Canadian Youth Alliance - National, Philippine Women Centre of BC
Alex Stojicevic  Chair, National Citizenship and Immigration Law Section, Canadian Bar Association
Carmel Wiseman  Lawyer, Policy and Legal Services Department, Law Society of British Columbia
Nancy Salloum  Chairperson, Canadian Society of Immigration Practitioners
Elie Hani  Vice-Chair, Canadian Society of Immigration Practitioners

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

Mr. Chairman, the point I want to make is that there is a difference between reporting for the press, coming to a meeting and making a news clip, and having something televised. When we have something televised, we have a committee meeting and coverage of that meeting from start to finish. And this is not the case. This is no different from having somebody from a radio station or any of the other media people coming in, taking some notes, talking about the issue, and dealing with it. This is not being televised. There will be a news story on it, but right now, we're not being filmed, and this is not playing on the air. When we're back in Ottawa, when we have televised meetings, then it goes from gavel to gavel, and that's televised. This is totally different.

Getting back to the motion, Mr. Chair, this is a procedural issue that we're dealing with, not a substantive motion. And I can tell you, Mr. Chair, the two times I chaired the committee, in 2003 and 2005, when we went from coast to coast, we never tried to shut down the media. I know there have been manuals written for the chairs of committees on how to frustrate the work of committees, but, Mr. Chair, I really hope you don't go down that road.

I have another motion I want to raise after this.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Well, I'm not about to get into defining what is televised and what isn't. I can only tell you that we're governed by the House of Commons rules, and the House of Commons rules are very clear in the Standing Orders. As chair of the committee, I'm bound by the Standing Orders.

With respect to motions, I want to remind the committee again that we did have a motion before we came to the committee, saying that we would not have any substantive motions come before the committee while we were having these hearings, and we all unanimously agreed to that.

I would say to the committee that we're wasting valuable time here.

So the ruling is that I have to go by Standing Order 119.1(1) of the House.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Is the committee the master of its own decisions?

My question to you is very simple, sir. Are we the masters of our own decisions?

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

We cannot alter the rules of the House of Commons when it comes to the Standing Orders. We can't adjust or ignore what the Standing Orders are. We're governed, as every member knows, by the Standing Orders.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

With due respect, sir, is this being broadcast live?

I understand that the Standing Orders say that when we're in session, it should be broadcasted.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

No, it doesn't say anything about live or not.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Well, in the House of Commons we are being broadcast. Yes or no?

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

That's irrelevant. We're talking about the committee.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

It has relevance, sir, because if my constituents wanted to amend—

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I'm asking the committee to respect the fact that we have witnesses here today who want to present their views to us so that we can in turn present those views to the minister at some point.

Now, we're wasting valuable time, and I would ask—

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Mr. Chair, I asked a question. I want an answer, sir.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I will shut down this hearing if I can't proceed.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

If you shut it down, then I'll challenge your shutting it down, sir.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I will shut down this hearing if the committee can't proceed.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Sir, in the House of Commons, people can tune in and listen. Are we having the same capability here? Can anybody tune in and listen to what is happening to the committee--yes or no?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I am not about to define what the standing order is. It's very clear. The standing order says that we have to have permission first of all from the House of Commons to do it.

Now, do you want me to proceed here, or do I have to say to these witnesses, who have gone through an awful lot of trouble to be here today, that we are not going to hear them and we're not going to hear the other people who have come here? Is this what you want me to do?

We have come thousands of miles to hear these people. Now, will you--

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Mr. Chair, let's not play politics here. You got a request to let these people in. You ruled against it. The chair was challenged. Let's put it to a vote.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

No. This is a standing order of the House of Commons and we have to abide by it.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

What does the standing order say about travelling?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

The standing order is very clear. We have to have permission of the House of Commons before we can allow--

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Could you read that again, sir?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

It reads as follows:

Any committee wishing to have its proceedings televised, other than by means of those facilities provided for that purpose by the House of Commons, shall first obtain the consent of the House thereto.

It's very clear.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

That states in the House of Commons; does it state when it's travelling?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Look, I'm not going to entertain this any longer.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

You're shutting down the press. That's what you're doing. You're muzzling the press.