Evidence of meeting #17 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was claimants.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Stephan Reichhold  Director, Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes réfugiées et immigrantes
Richard Goldman  Committee Coordinator to Aid Refugees, Table de concertation des organismes au service des personnes réfugiées et immigrantes
Glynis Williams  Director, Action Réfugiés Montréal
Maude Côté  Program Coordinator, Action Réfugiés Montréal
Julia Porter  Settlement Social Worker, Association for New Canadians
John Norquay  Staff Immigration Lawyer, HIV and AIDS Legal Clinic (Ontario)
David Matas  Lawyer, As an Individual
Ezat Mossallanejad  Policy Analyst and Researcher, Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture
William Bauer  Former Canadian Ambassador, Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, As an Individual

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

I know you can.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

If you'd give me a chance to explain while you're looking, it would be great. Do I have the floor, Mr. Chair?

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Just give me one second. We had a motion for four days of clause-by-clause. That was amended to make the clause-by-clause two days, the 1st and the 3rd. That's why there's a little bit of confusion up here.

It said with respect to the last two days there would be additional evenings, of up to three hours' duration, beginning the 6th, and on the last day to the end, which means 11:59.

So my interpretation is that we don't have any more meetings after 11:59, unless there is unanimous consent. That was the decision.

5:35 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Why don't you folks work this out?

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

Olivia, you asked a question. There is such a simple answer to this. We all agreed that we are going to conclude our meetings by June 3 at 11:59. What was included in that condition to be able to get it back to the House—we could have third reading and get it over to the Senate before we rose for the summer—was an agreement that, number one, we were going to meet as a subcommittee to go through what all the potential amendments were going to be from each of the four parties, so we could make sure we laid out a process to go through clause-by-clause that was fair to everybody, so all amendments could go and there would be no surprises, and there was--

5:35 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Before the 1st...

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

Yes, that's right, before the 1st, so we need to set that meeting.

The final, most important part of that is that there is an agreement here that we are going to make sure--and we in fact agreed with each other and have guaranteed it--that there will be no filibusters, no attempt to get out of any type of vote on any one of the clauses by trying to carry this out to 11:59.

So I think we have a pretty darn good process in place to take us through for those two days, and in fact I can assure the chair that we are not going to individually--I'm speaking from a party perspective--try to hold up or change anything or try to not include something for discussion or debate prior to 11:59.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

The chair doesn't recall some of those things, like agreements for no filibustering. I assume that's an agreement between the--

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

It is, Chair. I didn't mean that for your ears.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

I assume that's an agreement between the critics.

As far as I'm concerned, however, this dealing of the hearings and the clause-by-clause ends on June 3 at, if necessary--I put those words in--11:59.

5:35 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Mr. Chair, just for argument's sake, I'm not saying it would happen, but what would happen if a member of the government decided, because they don't like the amendments, because they think the amendments would pass, that we'd just keep talking until 11:59 and we'd never get to vote on the amendments?

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

It's now been said by Mr. Dykstra, which I don't think is in the motion, and I gather the way he's saying it he can confirm this, that there's an agreement between the critics that there will be no filibustering.

5:35 p.m.

An hon. member

That's right.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

There are no time limits on debates, so I'm relying on you people. It's your show.

5:35 p.m.

Bloc

Thierry St-Cyr Bloc Jeanne-Le Ber, QC

In any case, the majority will always win. There is no way around that. Everyone was acting in good faith. We will get through this. If we are dealing with a minority partner who is not acting in good faith, this partner will not be able to hold up our proceedings, because, at the end of the day, the committee will decide what the bill will look like once it has completed its work.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Are you happy, Ms. Chow?

5:35 p.m.

NDP

Olivia Chow NDP Trinity—Spadina, ON

Yes, I'm always happy.

5:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

All right.

This meeting is adjourned until six o'clock.