Okay.
I produced an eight-page paper for the committee last October when you discussed the private member's bill. The reasons I think it's ill-advised and not going to advance anything are all in that paper. The original submission has probably been made available to you.
I think the RAD would not only perform no useful function but would reduce the effectiveness and the fairness of the existing system.
I'll leave it at that, but I would like to say that there hasn't been much indication, from my reading of testimony and the number of letters that have been put out to be mailed to MPs and so on, of any willingness to compromise on this bill among large groups of people. If 80% of the Canadian public thinks the system is failing and is inadequate, I think some way must be found to hear it from the 80%, rather than from the few professional organizations whose job it is to lobby.
I'd be glad to answer questions about any of the things I've said or anything else, at your leisure, Mr. Chair.