Thank you, Madam Chair.
Welcome to all of our guests.
I've listened very carefully to the testimony. I apologize for missing part of yours, Mr. Grubel.
I have to tell you that there's something you said just recently that I'm a little bit concerned about. We know that you have a problem with detention. We understand that. I'm not disputing your personal opinion on that particular issue. You said that you have a problem with people being detained because they arrive with false documents. Before you say anything, I have to tell you that I can't think of a better reason to detain someone than that they arrive with false documents, because we don't know who they are. I'm a little concerned about a statement, made across the board, that you have a problem with detention, and part of it is because people arrive with false documents.
Having said that, I'd like to ask you a very simple question. You were actually going to dispute the number of 41 people from those two vessels being inadmissible to Canada. Regardless of the number you have or the number my colleague said there were, a number of people were actually found to be inadmissible for security reasons or for other reasons, such as war crimes, etc.
If they arrived without documents and with false documents, would you welcome any of those 41 people into your house and take full responsibility for their actions and whereabouts? Or do you think that detention is necessary so that we can identify people who arrive on our border, unannounced, illegally, through human smuggling, in mass arrivals? Do you not think that the Government of Canada owes the citizens of Canada the safety and security we need to give them?
It's a simple yes or no answer, really.