Evidence of meeting #84 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Thank you very much, Chair.

The issue before the committee, as I understand it—and it's my first time here on this issue, and the first time, I think, on this committee at all, actually—is the request for a 30-day extension. The purpose of the extension is to allow an expansion of the scope of the bill. That's my understanding of what's before us.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

A point of order.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

A point of order, Mr. Dykstra.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

It's great to have Mr. Christopherson here. He's a good guy and he and I go back a long way, too, but I think he probably knows why we're here and we certainly don't need to hear it again. He's filling in for someone, and I understand that. If he's prepared to enter some new arguments, he's presenting for the first time—

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Well, they're new to me.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

—to committee here....

Now he's interrupting me as he claims I do to him, but I'll keep going.

If he would like to offer anything new on this side of the House—

10 a.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

On a point of order, Chair.

10 a.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

—we're happy to hear it, but we don't need to hear reiterated what we already know we're here for.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

On the same point of order, Mr. Harris.

10 a.m.

NDP

Jack Harris NDP St. John's East, NL

I understand Mr. Dykstra's interest in prolonging debate and interjecting from time to time, but it's rather premature. All I heard Mr. Christopherson say was that he understood that the purpose of the extension was to seek to expand the scope of the bill. So he's making a reference to why the extension is being sought.

I know there's a certain amount going on, with trying to narrow anything anybody might say to very specific words, but surely Mr. Dykstra should have some patience and allow Mr. Christopherson to let the committee know what he wants to say before he jumps in with a point of order. I'd be happy to debate a point of order when one arises.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Thank you, sir.

Mr. Christopherson, I will be patient. If you're going in the same direction that Mr. Dykstra has suggested, we have gone over that. You can continue. I will be patient and I know you'll get to your point soon.

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Thank you, Chair, I appreciate that.

Yes, I would acknowledge the history of Mr. Dykstra, especially in the context of Canada, as we're practically neighbours—Hamilton and St. Catharines.

I think I was just attempting to warm up to the subject to make sure I was clear. I understand this may have been said before, but not by me, and that's the purpose of committee: you have a right to come in and say your bit. That's why we're elected.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Actually, you don't, Mr. Christopherson. I have made a ruling throughout and I'm not going to repeat it. It's your obligation to be informed about my rulings. If points have been made and speeches have been made in debate by other members, you can't do it again.

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

If I may say, Chair, with the greatest of respect, by that theory, one member of any caucus, on any bill, could walk into a committee room and make all the arguments that his or her caucus wanted to make, and then what would be the point of anyone else being there because they had never heard such a ruling?

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

That's my ruling.

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Well, I understand that, and I'm suggesting to you that you're denying me my rights.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Well, you can suggest that and you can challenge me, but I've already ruled on that and I'm not going to do it again.

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I understand that you've been here for a long time at this committee, but I have just arrived and I still have some rights.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Proceed. Proceed. Proceed. Proceed.

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Even if you're going to deny them, there's a procedure to do that, too.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

I'm going to move on, Mr. Christopherson.

10 a.m.

NDP

Jinny Sims NDP Newton—North Delta, BC

I will challenge the chair.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

I'm going to move on, Mr. Christopherson

10 a.m.

NDP

David Christopherson NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I haven't repeated anything. I haven't finished doing the introduction.

10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

All you're doing is arguing with the chair and I'm not going to let you do that. I'm going to move on, if all you want to do is argue with me.