I will consult with the clerk for a moment.
I'm trying to interpret what you're saying, Monsieur Giguère. I think I'm interpreting it as your alleging that I as the chairman am not giving you the right to speak on what you want to speak on. I think that's what you're saying, and if it is—if this interpretation is correct—then we're getting back to something that we've already ruled on.
I can't make my position clearer than I did with Mr. Lamoureux. There are certain things that you can talk about and there are certain things that you can't talk about. I don't want to get into that. The chair has even been challenged on a number of those things.
You have the right to speak, but on the other hand the topics must be relevant. The issues can't be repeated. I've said this over and over.
That's my interpretation of what you have said; therefore, you are getting into an area that I've already ruled on.