Chair, I want to once again say that I'm not talking about revisiting. I know we've had discussions at this committee before. What I'm talking about are the unknown, or unintended, consequences of pieces of legislation that none of us can predict ahead of time but find out after the legislation gets implemented. That's what we were hearing about yesterday.
Actually, this morning when I went into my office and looked at my desk, a number of correspondences related to that, saying, please, we would like you to raise concerns around the impact of the legislation.
I think that's legitimate work of this committee. I would really like an opportunity to do that.
That is one example. The other one I think is where even the minister is in agreement; he has sort of said that he is concerned about the huge wait-lists for citizenship. As a matter of fact, last week, in order to facilitate some of that, I know it was a test that the government approved; they now said a rewrite can be done.
Once again, it's another item that this committee could be discussing. During this time, the extension of 30 days, we could be discussing to see how we can further improve and lessen the negative impacts of legislation, as well as look at some new ideas for studies.
On the temporary resident visa one, the TRV one, which we just started, I don't think there is an MP in the House who doesn't hear concerns about weddings, funerals, christenings, or tourists.