Thank you.
Ms. Sims, I did listen to what Mr. Harris said, and I mentioned the issue of relevance and the issue of repetition. I did that as a caution to Ms. Sims.
I suppose Ms. Sims is getting into the topic of how the extension—I think this was Mr. Harris' point, at least I believe it was, and he'll correct me if it wasn't—could affect the other business of the committee and that, therefore, she's free to talk about that.
That may be a new point. We have discussed it to some degree, but some of the issues that you're getting into are new and probably are, therefore, relevant.
My purpose for interjecting, Ms. Sims and Mr. Harris, was just to caution that that issue may be relevant—how the motion may affect other business of the committee—but I just don't want you to get into repetitive matters.
But I do rule that if that's where you're going, it is relevant.