As my colleague said, there has been a breach in the trust between the government and the community because of negative experiences. The people have experienced difficulties at every step they have taken. What Mr. Cima went through is an example, a typical case. There are a number of typical cases.
Trust is a key element in reconciling with the community and these people who are in a vulnerable situation, in rebuilding the bridge. The government's rhetoric needs to change. We need a discourse that favours the emergence of this trust. We need to stress that we don't want to send them back. We need to say that these are not tactics for sending people back.
The requirements need to be adapted to the reality of the information and other things that can be obtained to regularize the status of individuals. As we were saying earlier, the situation in Haiti is not a deception; it happened in front of the entire world. The whole world provided assistance because it saw the enormity of the situation. There is still political instability in Haiti. There cannot be a government, only a transitional government. The current situation, the economic and social insecurity, the health problems because of all the epidemics, all those things have not been dealt with.
Traditionally, Canada is not in the habit of sending people back to a country where they are still more vulnerable than they are at present. We need to develop a discourse to encourage this trust, so that people feel that when they deal with the Canadian government, the experience is positive, and that they have no reason to be afraid because things work when we do what is required.