Certainly. Thank you for this.
The process will work roughly as follows, and perhaps I'll try to answer Mr. Uppal's question as part of my response.
The task force is going to have senior officials from IRCC and CBSA. CBSA is going to refer to IRCC the individuals who are implicated. We will investigate on the basis of the totality of the evidence, including whether a person, in fact, did come to study and whether they complied with the terms of the permit they thought they were legitimately issued, and we will look at other factors that a student may be able to adduce.
If the determination at the end of that process is that the person did not have knowledge of the fraudulent documentation that allowed them to enter Canada and they genuinely intended to study, they'll be permitted to remain in Canada. They'll be issued a temporary resident permit and will be able to continue to work or study, as the case may be, until they come to the next step in their immigration journey in Canada, at which point we will be able to use humanitarian and compassionate grounds to make sure their application is not prejudiced, should they fall into the cohort of people who we believe were not complicit in fraud but instead were taken advantage of by fraudsters.
At the end of the day, the goal here is to make sure the immigration journey for the innocent actors is not interrupted by this dramatically unfortunate episode. We need to have the fact-finding process to determine whether somebody who came to Canada on a study permit but with no intent to study actually should be able to face the consequences, particularly if they knew about the fraud that allowed them to enter Canada and decided to move forward with their application anyway.