Thank you for your presentation, Mr. Sapers, and I also want to thank the committee for supporting my motion to have you come before us today.
I have a couple of specific questions.
I want to go back to your report for a second. On page 11, you talked about the Canada Correctional Service remaining in large part unfocused and fragmented, and you specifically talked about recommending in previous years that the service appoint a deputy commissioner. I just want to make sure people see these pieces, because these are important parts of a long-standing number of recommendations that your office has made over many numbers of years, and the situation does not look like it's improving.
I want to do a couple of technical pieces, as you raised sections 81 and 84, and the classification piece. I want to address the classification piece first because it sounds like there has been a change.
The department's response on page 43 of this report was that the security classification tool used by CSC was appropriate for aboriginal offenders and that the criteria used to classify offenders are contained in.... My understanding is that you are saying they have switched their position since this, because their departmental response was that the classification tool was appropriate. I'm hearing you say they are now saying they are going to review the classification tool and develop a new one.
Am I misunderstanding something?