That's a really good question, one that comes back to a couple of the points I tried to make in my presentation.
Too much of the work on arctic climate change and adaptation is not focused at the community level, so it's very difficult for territorial governments and for first nations to properly appreciate what is going on. Much of the modelling that has been done is way up at about 17,000 feet, and what we're trying to deal with is right at the community level. So a great deal of the research...
The authority question is a little different one.
To my knowledge, right now we have people like the chairman of the National Energy Board spending a good deal of time in the north trying to understand better the issues there. I'm very aware of the efforts to try to work with the three levels of government—federal, territorial, and first nation—in connection with it.
It's a unique system of government that we have evolved here in Canada to try to develop this. Is it working fully and properly today? I don't think it is. That's why in my presentation I talk about further integration.
Are the resources there today that are necessary to do the kind of work we're talking about in terms of these risks? I don't think they are. As Canada begins to take a greater interest in the north, whether in defence, economic development, or sovereignty in circumpolar questions, I think we as Canadians have to invest in a lot of this to a higher degree than we're doing today.
Please understand that when I'm talking about this I'm including the provincial north, not just what I'm doing in the federal north. I'm very aware, for instance, of the very important work that has been done by some of my friends in Quebec in connection with these northern questions.