Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to the officials for being with us today.
I'm very concerned that two years ago the Government of Canada gave a sweetheart deal to Stellantis. At the time, the Parliamentary Budget Officer implored Parliament to be apprehensive about the contract and the challenges we're facing today. He said at the time that it's very difficult to take into account all of the unknowns that may materialize as a result of the provisions that you, the Government of Canada, gave to this company.
The minister at the time said that the actions they were taking that day, these investments, would lead to a hundred years of new prosperity for the automotive sector.
Mr. Turnbull said that Conservatives were on the wrong side of the green revolution and that these contracts were going to revolutionize—the exact word was “revolutionize”—the way we make cars in Canada. Two years later, we're seeing job losses and we're seeing legal action and we're seeing people whose livelihoods are lost, and that is scary, so I want to touch base upon the NextStar contract today, specifically on adjustments.
When the Government of Canada was negotiating this, it wanted to mimic what was taking place in the United States. I think the contract refers to the AMPC. We were going to tie all of our subsidies and contributions to what the Americans were doing. In fact, the contract is so in favour of ceding sovereignty to the United States that it even talks about how, if Stellantis were to go to the United States, it would allow them to still receive subsidies from Canadian taxpayers.
How was this in the interests of Canadians, and how in good faith can Canadians have confidence that the Department of Industry and the government right now are even negotiating in good faith?
Frankly, I would just like a straight-up answer as well. Was this the worst policy blunder in the history of Canada?