As I mentioned in my opening comments, I think Industry Canada went to great lengths to try to diminish possible negative consequences on business and those who might make a mistake, or who really aren't the ones who are filling up inboxes of individual Canadians, or citizens around the world for that matter, or Canadian businesses. But it's still placing Canadian businesses in the position of having to now comply with what is in essence a new and potentially overlapping regulatory regime, because a business, large or small, still has to defend itself before the regulator, which is the CRTC in this case, or the Competition Bureau, or defend itself before a private right of action. There are definite provisions for undertakings. I've had people e-mail me and ask me, what's an undertaking? Does a small company actually know what it means to do that?
There's no doubt that over time the regulator would come up and develop those practices, but for those types of situations, the ones that really aren't harmful--these aren't the ones that are filling people's inboxes--we have a perfectly legitimate privacy regime that works. So it's just flipping it on its head a little bit, if you like, and rather than have the legitimate company have to defend themselves, it could also be that all those factors that you listed, those are the things you use to nail the ones who are flaunting the law.