Right.
The information I'm reading on the Patent Act comes from the submission of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, actually. It was a helpful reference earlier, and I'm finding it helpful here now. Looking at the definition of “authorization”, I believe the previous wording referred to “authorization granted under subsection 21.04(1)”. The part that's struck out is “and includes an authorization renewed under subsection 21.12(1)”. That is the part you are talking about being struck out. Mr. Garneau's amendment doesn't address the striking out of that provision.