I think it comes back to the two fundamental framework issues that we discussed. They view wholesale, high-speed access as equivalent to the retail Internet service offered by the incumbents. If you apply that equivalency, then it leads you down the UBB path, because then you're trying to make us look like them.
The other point is if you don't recognize that we are co-competitors across the board of equal standing, of equal stature, and we're perceived as a reseller, then it reinforces the first point.
You'd have to ask them, not me, but reading their whole jurisprudence over the years leads me to this conclusion.