I'll start with the last part of that question.
I think for all intents and purposes, we speak as one with our creators, and certainly you've seen the numbers and you've seen the impact of a reduction in royalties on creators' incomes. It has been pretty much in lockstep for publishers as well.
One of our challenges is trying to continue to see enough incentive in the marketplace for writers to actually agree to sign on with us and produce new product for the education sector. We have the same goal of trying to return some compensation for that particular effort.
With regard to statutory damages and the harmonization under the Copyright Board review that's under way currently, what we're looking for there is consistency across all creative sectors, because right now there are higher formulas for penalties in, say, the music industry and other areas, compared to in publishing. The background on that I can't really comment on, but we do know and have proposed to government that a more meaningful and more consistent set of damages in the language in the act would actually be very helpful, to present essentially a more consistent deterrent to violation.