Yes, of course. My position is clear: I do not think that should be included in the act. If Mr. Adams had wanted to recover copyright after 35 years, he could have done so in a number of ways. He could for instance have negotiated that from the outset or decided not to deal with a publisher. There were a number of avenues available to him.
I do not think that is the real issue in the review of the act. It is more a question of determining how revenues can be collected for authors and creators.