Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all the witnesses.
As they say in Quebec, I am “sur le cul”.
I don't know if you know what that means. It means “I'm on my ass.”
I don't know if that translates into that.
I apologize to the interpreters.
Ms. Wylie, you're giving us a particularly interesting lesson.
Bill C‑27 has been on the table for almost two years. It has been evaluated. It was created by public servants, obviously, in Ottawa. Some politicians have done some work to try to put in place legislation that would frame a problem that you don't really see. In fact, you are saying that all the legislation we need already exists. We simply have to proceed by sector to correct the elements that will be related to artificial intelligence.
At the committee, we have heard from people. Over the past few years, we have conducted studies on blockchain, the automotive industry, the right to repair, and so on.
Today, you are telling us that what we are doing is not working at all. You are telling us to take back the studies we have conducted and the existing legislation and to correct what will affect artificial intelligence, because it is already in all these sectors, let's face it.
My question is still for you, Ms. Wylie, but I would also like to know what Ms. Brandusescu and Ms. Casovan think of your position.