Do you think that the large number of interventions made by some groups, far more than others, could give the impression that industry players are trying to soften Bill C‑27, to make it more acceptable to them or easier to interpret and implement?
Are industry players looking to make their jobs easier at the expense of the real need to fundamentally protect privacy or children?
The purpose of the proposed legislation is to protect Canadians. Do you get the impression that these organizations want to water down the bill—if I can put it that way—to make it easier to interpret?