Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to thank the committee for having me here today, even though it's not a committee I usually sit on. It's a pleasure to be here.
I want to thank the witnesses for their presentations.
Mr Konikoff, if you don't mind, I'd like to talk about automated decision systems. As we know, Bill C‑27 grants a new right, namely the right for an individual to receive an explanation about the use of these systems. However, unlike Quebec's Bill 25, Bill C‑27 does not contain provisions that would allow a person to object to the use of an automated decision system or to have a review of the decisions made by such a system.
In your opinion, what are the potential repercussions for consumers and users if Bill C‑27 does not include such provisions?