My understanding of the industry would tell me that the cost and complexity of operating into the Great Lakes, for example, is significant. That's why companies like the ones you've described have been successful, because they've had the right policies, regulatory frameworks, and investment to be able to do that type of trade.
When you look outside of the Great Lakes, it's probably the area that we focus more attention on with respect to the agreement, because the opportunities may be greater. The reality is that the competitive nature can exist under the current regime, so it's difficult to say whether....
We could speculate as to whether there's an opportunity for EU investment in east coast trades, for example. The reality is that the potential negative consequences in the long term....
Quite frankly, if that competition were there, that's fine. The concern is that when that competition goes away, a lot of the investments that need to happen to maintain the capability in those waters may be neglected over time.