What I would say again is that the agency identified that over 15 years, roughly 20% of the items coming across the border were misclassified. We felt that this was information they should use to go back and assess the brokers' activities. Are some brokers doing better jobs than others? Why are some perhaps not doing as good a job as others?
We felt first of all, then, that they should use that type of information to do a periodic assessment of the brokers to see how well they are applying the rules. The other thing we noted was that the penalties are actually quite low; I think the average penalty was $150. The penalties are whatever the penalties are, but whether there is actually much deterrent effect in a penalty that averages $150 is the other thing that I think we said they should look at. Penalties presumably exist to be a deterrent. Are they deterring, and are they actually incenting the activity that you want, which is good management of the system?