Not only are they our only border, but with regard to our commodity exports, all our infrastructure is built to go there. We would be wise to diversity our infrastructure so that we can get to foreign markets, especially the Pacific one.
You know, a couple of weekends ago I was in Texas. I popped down to Austin to check it out. I was in the Government of Alberta for a while, and we took a close look at what happened in Texas. They were pretty smart there. After the 1986 oil shock, they told themselves essentially what I'm saying here, which is that we need to diversify and we need more markets. What's that about? It's about the federal government and provinces and industry, perhaps led by banks, deciding that we're going to systematically exploit both commodity and value-added markets in Asia-Pacific and in Europe, in a circumstance in which this negotiation has taught us how dangerously dependent we are on that market, and how little leverage and consequence we have. It's the second point that's really my point.
This trade relationship is governed by this agreement. Hopefully it's going to continue to be governed for some time, and we have precious little leverage here, because we really don't have any other significant markets to rely on. We must remedy that.